翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Smitham Chimney, East Harptree ・ SmithAmundsen ・ Smithatris ・ Smithboro, Illinois ・ Smithborough ・ Smithborough railway station ・ Smithbrook ・ Smith Township, Belmont County, Ohio ・ Smith Township, Greene County, Indiana ・ Smith Township, Indiana ・ Smith Township, Mahoning County, Ohio ・ Smith Township, Ohio ・ Smith Township, Posey County, Indiana ・ Smith Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania ・ Smith Township, Whitley County, Indiana ・ Smith v Croft (No 2) ・ Smith v Eric S Bush ・ Smith v Gardner Merchant ・ Smith v Glasgow City District Council ・ Smith v Hughes ・ Smith v Knights of Columbus ・ Smith v Land and House Property Corp ・ Smith v Leech Brain & Co Ltd ・ Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd ・ Smith v Parsons ・ Smith v Smith ・ Smith v. Allwright ・ Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County ・ Smith v. Bolles ・ Smith v. California Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Smith v Croft (No 2) ： ウィキペディア英語版 Smith v Croft (No 2) ''Smith v Croft (No 2)'' () Ch 114 is a UK company law case concerning derivative claims. Its principle that in allowing a derivative claim to continue the court will have regard to the majority of the minority's views has been codified in Companies Act 2006, section 263(4). ==Facts== Minority shareholders claimed to recover money paid away contrary to the financial assistance prohibition (now found at section 678 of the Companies Act 2006) and being ''ultra vires''. They had 14% of the company's shares, the defendants held 63%, and other shareholder, who did not want litigation, held 21%. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Smith v Croft (No 2)」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.